![]() No need to draw on a bio passport because the CIR in endogenous testosterone should be consistent with the CIR in other hormones / biochemical compounds produced by the individual. There's T/E ratio and there's also CIR (carbon isotope ratio) testing. If riders have been on exogenous testosterone from before their first test/measurement and establishment of their baseline bio passport, then they can basically stay on it and keep it at whatever (elevated) levels are within the boundaries of "normal" When high levels of testosterone are detected, the ratio between it and epitestosterone are measured. Exogenous testosterone is indistinguishable from endogenous testosterone. “The passport for each rider contains the results of individual urine and blood tests, a haematological profile consisting of the combined results of haematological parameters analyzed in a series of blood samples, and a steroid longitudinal profile consisting of the combined results of steroid levels in a series of urine samples,” according to the UCI.Not true. Variations in those levels can sometimes warrant a review or re-testing of samples, as in Compton’s case according to her statement. These levels are tracked over time so as to establish a “normal” baseline for every athlete. The athlete biological passport, sometimes called a bio-passport for short, is used by anti-doping agencies to discern subtle changes in athletes’ natural haematological and steroid levels. ![]() And not only that, I never took anything for ethical and moral reasons I’ve been a strong proponent of clean sport my entire career and feel doing anything to enhance one’s own natural ability is cheating, full stop.”Ĭompton also said that she decided to retire in March. I know how delicate women’s hormones are, and I would never choose to take anything to jeopardize my health and, as a result, suffer irreparable damage to my endocrine system. This was devastating news to me as I have never intentionally or knowingly put anything like that into my body. In early February of 2021, after returning from a difficult race season, I learned that the same sample from September was re-analyzed due to a bio-passport irregularity and found to be positive for an exogenous anabolic steroid. I’ve received that same letter after every test I’ve submitted for the last 19 years. That news was communicated to me in the same way it has always been via a letter from USADA. I provided a sample for USADA in September 2020 that came back negative for any banned substances, it was not even atypical. ![]() USADA decided to re-test it after her Athlete Biological Passport (bio-passport) was flagged for an “irregularity.” The second test of the sample came back positive for an anabolic androgenic steroid, Compton said. She said her results for that sample originally came back negative for any banned substances. ![]() Join Bicycling All Access for more cycling newsĬompton released a statement addressing the USADA’s announcement. That means all of her results, race points, and prizes received since September 16, 2020, are forfeit. Anabolic agents have powerful performance-enhancing capabilities and can give an athlete an unfair advantage over fellow competitors,” the USADA statement explained.Ĭompton’s ban begins retroactively, from the day her positive sample was taken. “Her urine sample was analyzed using a specialized test, known as Carbon Isotope Ratio testing, that differentiates between anabolic androgenic steroids (AAS) naturally produced by the body and prohibited anabolic agents of external origin.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |